23 março 2007

Trecho da semana













No congestionamento, hoje, esta frase saltou dos alto-falantes:

"But if you are feeling sinister
Go off and see a minister

He'll try in vain to take away the pain of being a hopeless unbeliever"


Isso é Belle and Sebastian. Identificações à parte, é interessante alguém cantar uma letra dessas de forma tão doce, tão lânguida. Isso poderia ser cantado por Korn, Marilyn Manson ou Black Sabbath, sem soar deslocado.

Os gêmeos de Floyd & Sebastian



Todo mundo sabe que um clássico do Pink Floyd chamado "Have a Cigar" fala do momento em que a banda vai assinar o contrato com a gravadora, quando o empresário ou produtor oferece um charuto, e depois acaba perguntado, com a célebre frase, "a propósito, qual de vocês é o Pink".

Este post é uma homenagem a uma canção gêmea dessa, chamada "Seymour Stein", do grupo escocês Belle and Sebastian. Calma, calma, não há nada de plágio. É apenas uma balada sobre o mesmo tema, a assinatura do contrato com a gravadora. Essa música já serviu de trilha sonora para muito congestionamento, linda, ótima para se cantar junto a todos os pulmões, para pasmaceira do entregador de panfletos no semáforo. Já testei cantá-la no meio da noite para meu filho parar de chorar, e funcionou. Também, com uma semana de vida, dava para sussurar até "Iron Man" que ele dormiria igual...

Será que Roger Waters gostaria de "Seymour Stein"? Sua "Have a Cigar" era ácida e irônica, enquanto a balada escocesa é melancólica e triste. Se bem que nenhuma delas é exatamente uma canção feliz.
Interessante que no artigo sobre "Have a Cigar" na Wikipedia, diz-se que Gilmour não cantaria uma letra assim. Não sabia que ele era tão escoteiro. Como Waters estava com a garganta estourada, chamaram o velho Roy Harper para fazer o vocal principal. O mesmo Roy que havia sido homenageado em "Hats Off to (Roy) Harper", do Led Zeppelin III.

Mapas de peso

Este interessante artigo do Daily Mail mostra os países inchados ou emagrecidos conforme consumo de álcool, riqueza, gastos militares... Divertido.

How the world really shapes up

by VICTORIA MOORE - More by this author » Last updated at 10:12am on 1st March 2007

We all know what the world looks like. But a new series of extraordinary maps shows our planet in a very different light.

Rather than defining each country by size, these computer-generated modified maps - or cartograms - redraw the globe with each country's size proportionate to its strengths, or weaknesses, in a whole series of categories.

For instance, when it comes to military spending, the U.S. appears bloated, but Africa is huge when HIV prevalence is mapped.

The cartograms were produced in a unique collaboration between the universities of Michigan in the U.S. and Sheffield. Here are images and more details on some of the most fascinating...

Alcohol Consumption (2001)

Click enlarge for bigger image

Enlarge the image

The average Western European drinks over a third more alcohol than the average person in any other area on earth. In some places there is practically no alcohol consumption, which is why many Middle Eastern countries are not visible on this map.

Ugandans drink the most alcohol per adult, closely followed by Luxembourg, the Czech Republic and Ireland.

The map shows the proportion of worldwide alcohol drunk in 2001. It does not take population density into account, so some countries, such as Australia, are unexpectedly shrivelled, while Britain is particularly bloated even though we not in the top ten.

HIV Prevalence

The map shows the distribution of all people aged 15-49 with HIV. In 2003, the highest HIV prevalence was in Swaziland, where almost four in every ten people, were HIV positive. All ten territories with the highest prevalence of HIV are in central and southeastern Africa.

Click enlarge for bigger image

Enlarge the image

House Prices

The most expensive housing stock per person in the world is in Europe, the cheapest in the African regions and Southern Asia - despite taking into account that money goes further in these territories. Britain, with its non-stop housing boom, looks disproportionately large.

Click enlarge for bigger image

Enlarge the image

Military Spending

Aa the world's biggest military spender in 2002, the U.S. appears hugely bloated in this map, taking up 45 per cent of the world's land mass. It spent $353 billion on arms, out of a world total of $789 billion.

While America spent the money, it reaped hardly any of the consequences - the U.S. shrinks to almost nothing in the map of war deaths on the right...

Click enlarge for bigger image

Enlarge the image

War and death

In 2002, there were an estimated 172,000 war deaths worldwide, across 80 territories. The Democratic Republic of Congo (dark red) bore the brunt - 26 per cent - of the total figure.

Nine territories accounted for 70 per cent of all deaths. Burundi had the highest death rate owing to war at 1.2 people per thousand of the population.

Enlarge the image

Toy Imports

The following two maps demonstrate the passage of the world's toys from east to west. The U.S. (blue) is the world's biggest net importer of toys, followed by the UK and Europe (red). The lowest importer of toys is Africa (orange).

Click enlarge for bigger image

Enlarge the image

Toy Exports

As the world's biggest net exporter of toys, China appears on the map like a vivid green giant, attached to the paler green Hong Kong, the second largest net exporter. Britain's once-great toy export industry has all but disappeared.

Click enlarge for bigger image

Enlarge the image

Wealth of Nations (1500)

The big difference between 1500 and 2002 (next map) is that all that time ago, the vast bulk of the world's wealth was contained in European and Asian countries. Measured by Gross Domestic Product per person, the wealthiest regions were Eastern and Southern Asia.

Click enlarge for bigger image

Enlarge the image

Wealth of Nations (2002)

Today, 500 years on, the money has all moved west: 46 per cent of the wealth is in North America and Western Europe. Along with Japan, these are the regions with the most purchasing power per person, while the people with the lowest purchasing power are to be found in Africa.

Click enlarge for bigger image

Enlarge the image